Science of Collaboratories logo - link
An alliance to advance the understanding of collaboratories
Science of Collaboratories
Resources : Bibliography of Collaboratories

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | R | S | T | V | W | Y | Z


Abbott, A. (2002). Alliance for cellular signaling: Into unknown territory Nature, 420, 600 - 601.

Ackerman, S. P. (2003). BIRN: Putting heads together in cyberspace NCRR Reporter, 27(4), 5-7.

Agarwal, D. A., Sachs, S. R., & Johnston, W. E. (1998). The reality of collaboratories. Computer Physics Communications, 110, 134-141.

AIP Study of Multi-Institutional Collaborations. (1992). Phase I: High-Energy Physics. New York: American Institute of Physics.

AIP Study of Multi-Institutional Collaborations. (1995). Phase II: Space Science and Geophysics. College Park: American Institute of Physics.

AIP Study of Multi-Institutional Collaborations. (1999). Phase III: Ground-Based Astronomy, Materials Science, Heavy-Ion and Nuclear Physics, Medical Physics, and Computer-Mediated Collaborations. College Park: American Institute of Physics.

AIP Study of Multi-Institutional Collaborations. (2001). Final Report. College Park: American Institute of Physics.

Aitken, J.S., Korf, R., Webber, B.L. and Bard, J.B.L. (2004). COBrA: a bio-ontology editor Bioinformatics, 21 (6), 825-826.

AL Cochrane (1999). Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services. London, England: .

Albrechtsen, H. (2004). Web-based collaboratories ñ from centres without walls to collaboratories in use Journal of Digital Information Management, 2(1), 2-3.

Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Alter, C. (1990). An exploratory study of conflict and coordination in interorganizational service delivery systems. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 478-502.

Arzberger, P., & Finholt, T. A. (2002). Data and collaboratories in the biomedical community: Report of a panel of experts meeting held September 16-18, 2002 in Ballston, VA. : .

Assael, H. (1969). Constructive Role of Interorganizational Conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 573-582.

Atkins, D. (1996). Electronic collaboratories and digital libraries Neuroimage, 4(3) Part 2, S55-S58.

Atkinson, P., Batchelor, C., & Parsons. E. (1998). Trajectories of Collaboration and Competition in a Medical Discovery Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23, 259-284.

Azmita, M. A., & Crowley, K. (2001). The rhythms of scientific thinking: A study of collaboration in an earthquake microworld. In K. Crowley, C. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.). Designing for science: Implications for everyday, classroom, and professional settings. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.


Bafoutsou, G., & Mentzas, G. (2002). Review and functional classification of collaborative systems International Journal of Information Management, 22, 281-305.

Bair, R. A. (1998). Collaboratories: Building electronic scientific communities. Chemical Sciences Roundtable Workshop: Impact of Advances in Computing and Communications Technologies on Chemical Science and Technology. (pp. 125-140). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Beghtol, C. (2004). The Iter Gateway to the Middle Ages and Renaissance: Collaboration between information specialists and subject specialists in the arts and humanities Journal of Digital Information Management, 2(1), 4-8.

Bekker, M. M., Olson, J. S., & Olson, G. M. (1995). Analysis of gestures in face-to-face design teams provides guidance for how to use groupware in design. in Olson, G. M., & Schuon, S. (Eds.). Proceedings of DIS'95. Symposium on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods and techniques. 23-25 August, 1995. Ann Arbor, MI. (pp. 157-166). New York: ACM.

Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase's penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm Yale Law Journal, 112(3), 369-446.

Berman, H. M. (2000). Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics. In Protein Data Bank Annual Report, 1999-2000. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.

Berman, H. M., Bourne, P. E., & Westbrook, J. (2004). The Protein Data Bank: A case study in management of community data Current Proteomics, 1, 49-57.

Bhandarkar, M., Budescu, G., Humphrey, W. F., & Izaguirre, J. A. (1999). BioCoRE: A collaboratory for structural biology. in Bruzzone, A. G., Uhrmacher, A., & Page, E. H. (Eds.). Proceedings of the SCS International Conference on Web-based Modeling and Simulation, San Francisco, CA, 1999. (pp. 242-251). San Diego, CA: Society for Computer Simulation.

Bishop, A. P. (1994). The Role of Computer Networks in Aerospace Engineering. Library Trends, 42, 694-729.

Bloom, F. E. & Young, Warren G. (2000). Electronic collaboration: Implications for neurosciences. In S. H. Koslow & M. F. Huerta (Eds.). Electronic collaboration in science. (pp. 113-141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bly, S., Keith, K. M., & Henline, P. A. (1997). The work of scientists and the building of collaboratories. in Group 97 International Conference on Supporting Group Work --Phoenix, Arizona, United States. (pp. (Conference preprint)). : .

Boldyreff, C., Kyaw, P., Nutter, D., and Rank, S. (2004). Supporting collaborative grid application development within the e-science community Journal of Digital Information Management, 2(1), 9-12.

Bowker, G. (2000). Biodiversity datadiversity Social Studies of Science, 30, 643-683..

Bozeman, B. and Corley, E. (2004). Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital Research Policy, 33(4), 599-616.

Brown, C. (2003). The changing face of scientific discourse: Analysis of genomic and proteomic database usage and acceptance Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 926-938.

Browning, L. D., Beyer, J. M., & Shetler, J. C. (1995). Building cooperation in a competitive industry: Sematech and the semiconductor industry. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 113-151.

Bruce, B. C., Carragher, B. O., Damon, B. M., Dawson, M. J., Eurell, J. A., Gregory, C. D., et al. (1997). Chickscope: an interactive MRI classroom curriculum innovation for K-12. Computers & Education, 29, 73-87.

Bruce, H. (1994). Internet services and academic work: An Australian perspective. Internet Research, 4, 24-34.

Buetow, K. H. (2005). Cyberinfrastructure: Empowering a "third way" in biomedical research Science, 308(5723), 821-824.

Burk, D. L. (2000). Intellectual property considerations in electronic collaborations. In S. H. Koslow & M. F. Huerta (Eds.). Electronic collaboration in science. (pp. 15-44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.


Caldas, A. (2003). Are newsgroups extending "invisible colleges" into the digital infrastructure of science? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 43-60.

Cambrosio, A., & Keating, P. (1988). "Going monoclonal": art, science, and magic in the day-to-day use of hybridoma technology. Social Problems, 35, 244-260.

Cameron, G., Rodriguez-Tome, P., & Apweiler, R. (2000). Electronic collaboration in molecular biology. In S. H. Koslow & M. F. Huerta (Eds.). Electronic collaboration in science. (pp. 73-87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Carley, K., & Wendt, K. (1991). Electronic mail and scientific communication: A study of the SOAR extended research group. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 12, 406-440.

Carragher, B., & Potter, C. S. (1998). The world wide laboratory: remote and automated access to imaging instrumentation. In Impact of Advances in Computing and Communications Technologies on Chemical Science and Technology: Report of a Workshop. Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, National Research Council. (pp. 141-153). Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

Casher, O. & Rzepa, H. S. (1995). A chemical collaboratory using Explorer EyeChem and the common client interface ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 29(2), 52-54.

Caspar, T. A., Meyer, W. M., Moiler, J. M., Henline, P., Keith, K., McHarg, B., Davis, S., & Greenwood, D. (1998). Collaboratory operations in magnetic fusion research. ACM Interactions, 5(3), 56-64.

Catalyzing team science: Report from the 2003 BECON Symposium. (2003). Retrieved 02/20/2004, from

Chin, G. Jr., Myers, J., & Hoyt, D. (2002). Social networks in the virtual science laboratory Communications of the ACM, 45(8), 87-92.

Chompalov, I., & Shrum, W. (1999). Institutional collaboration in science: A typology of technological practice Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24(3), 338-372.

Chompalov, I., Genuth, J., & Shrum, W. (2002). The organization of scientific collaborations Research Policy, 31(5), 749-767.

Churchill, E. F., & Bly, S. (1999). It's all in the words: supporting work activities with lightweight tools. Hayne, S. C. (Ed.). GROUP'99. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. 14-17 Nov. 1999; Phoenix, AZ. (pp. 40-49). New York: ACM.

Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially-shared cognition. (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Cleal, B. R., Andersen, H. H. K., Albrechtsen, H. (2004). Collaboration, communication and categorical complexity: A case study in collaboratory evaluation Journal of Digital Information, 2(1), 13-20.

Cogburn, D. L. (2003). HCI in the so-called developing world: What's in it for everyone Interactions, 10(2), 80-87.

Cogburn, D. L. (forthcoming). Globalization and human capacity in the knowledge economy: understanding geographically distributed collaborative learning between developed and developing countries. In D. Mulenga (Ed.). Globalization and lifelong learning: critical perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

Cogburn, D. L., Zhang, L., & Khothule, M. (2002). Going globally, locally: The socio-technical influences on performance in distributed collaborative learning teams. in Proceedings of the 2002 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on Enablement through technology. (pp. 52-64). : South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists.

Cohen, J. (1996). Computer mediated communication and publication productivity among faculty. Internet Research-Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 6, no. 2-3, 41-63.

Collins, H. M. (2003). LIGO becomes big science Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 33(2), 261-297.

Collins, H. M. (1998). The meaning of data: Open and closed evidential cultures in the the search for gravitational waves American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 293-338.

Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7, 119-135.

Covi, L. M., Olson, J. S., Rocco, E., & Miller, W. J. (1998). A room of your own: what do we learn about support of teamwork from assessing teams in dedicated project rooms. in Streitz, N. A., Konomi, S., & Burkhardt, H. J. (Eds.). Cooperative Buildings. Integrating Information, Organization, and Architecture. First International Workshop, CoBuild'98 Proceedings. (pp. 53-65). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges; diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Craver, J. M. & Gold, R. S. (2002). Research collaboratories: Their potential for health behavior researchers American Journal of Health Behavior, 26(6), 504-509.

Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 703-722.

Curtis, P. (1997). Mudding: Social phenomena in text-based virtual realities. In S. Kiesler (Ed). Culture of the internet. (pp. 121-142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.


David, P. A. & Keely, L. C. (2003). The endogenous formation of scientific research collaborations Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 93-116.

David, Paul A. and Spence, Michael (2003). Towards institutional infrastructures for e-science: The scope of the challenge. Oxford Internet Institute, , . Retrieved May 4, 2004, from

Davidow, W. H., & Malone, M. S. (1992). The virtual corporation: Structuring and revitalizing the corporation for the 21st century. New York: HarperCollinsPublishers.

de Moor, A., Keeler, M., & Richmond, G. (2002). Towards a pragmatic web. in Priss, U., Corbett, D., & Angelova, G. (editors). Conceptual structures: Integration and interfaces: 10th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2002, Borovets, Bulgaria, July 15-19, 2002 Proceedings. (pp. 235-249). Berlin: Springer.

DeSanctis, G., Staudenmayer, N., & Wong, S. (1999). Interdependence in virtual organizations. In C. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.). Trends in organizational behavior. (Vol. 6). (pp. 81-104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dickersin, K.; Eric Manheimer, Susan Wieland, Karen A. Rovinson, Carol LeFebvre, Steve McDonald (2002). Development of the Cochrane Collaboration's Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials Evaluation & The Health Professions, 25, 39-63.

Distefano, T. (1984). Interorganizational conflict - a Review of an emerging field Human Relations, 37, 351-366.

Dourish, P., Swinehart, D. C., & Theimer, M. (2000). The doctor is in: helping end users understand the health of distributed systems. In Ambler, A., Calo, S. B., & Kar, G. (Eds.). Services Management in Intelligent Networks. 11th IFIP/IEEE International Workshop on Distributed Systems: Operations and Management, DSOM 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol.1960). (pp. 157-168). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T.B. Ward & S.M. Smith (Eds). Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes. (pp. 461-493). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Duque, R. B., Ynalvez, M., Sooryamoorthy, R., Mbatia, P., Dzorgbo, D-B. S., & Shrum, W. (2005). Collaboration paradox: Scientific productivity, the Internet, and problems of research in developing areas Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 755-785.

Duranti, L. (2005). The long-term preservation of accurate and authentic digital data: The INTERPARES project
Data Science Journal, 4, 106-118.


Edelson, D. C., Pea, R. D., & Gomez, L. M. (1996). The Collaboratory notebook. Communications of the ACM, 39, 32-33.

Ellisman, Mark H. (2005). Cyberinfrastructure and the future of collaborative work Issues in Science and Technology, 22(1), 43-50.

Endersby, J. W. (1996). Collaborative research in the social sciences: Multiple authorship and publication credit. Social Science Quarterly, 77(2), 375-392.

Engelbart, D. C. (1963). A conceptual framework for the augmentation of man's intellect. In P. D. Howerton & D. C. Weeks (Eds.). Vistas in information handling, Volume 1. (pp. 1-29). Washington, D.C.: Spartan Books.

Epstein, S. L. (in press). Making interdisciplinary collaboration work. In S. J. Derry & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds). Problems and promises of interdisciplinary collaboration: Perspectives from cognitive science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Etzioni, A. (1975). A comparative analysis of complex organizations: On power, involvement, and their correlates. New York: Free Press.


Ferrin, T. (2000). A Collaboratory for Interactive Molecular Modeling. Presentation given at NCRR workshop.

Finholt, T. A. (2002). Collaboratories. in B. Cronin (Ed.). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 36. (pp. 73-107). Washington, D.C.: American Society for Information Science and Technology.

Finholt, T. A. (2003). Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 5-25.

Finholt, T. A., & Olson, G. M. (1997). From Laboratories to collaboratories: A new organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychological Science, 8(1), 28-36.

Finholt, T. A., Rocco, E., Bree, D., Jain, N., & Herbsleb, J. (1998). NotMeeting: A field trial of NetMeeting in a geographically distributed organization. SIGGROUP Bulletin, 21(1), 66-69.

Finholt, T. A., Sproull, L. S., & Kiesler, S. B. (2002). Outsiders on the inside: Sharing know-how across space and time. In P. Hinds & S. B. Kiesler (Eds.). Distributed work. (pp. 357-380). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Finholt, Thomas A. (2002). Collaboratories: Science over the Internet. in Teich, Albert H., Nelson, Stephen D., and Lita, Stephen J. (editors). AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook. (pp. 339-344). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., Root, R. W., & Rice, R. E. (1993). Video as a technology for informal communication. Communications of the ACM, 36, 48-61.

Fisher, B. S., Cobane, C. T., Vander Ven, T. M., & Cullen, F. T. (1998). How many authors does it take to publish an article? Trends and patterns in political science. PS-Political Science and Politics, 31(4), 847-856.

Fishman, B. (2000). How activity fosters CMS tool use in classrooms: Reinventing innovations in local contexts. Journal of Interactive Learning, 11(1), 3-27.

FlyBase Consortium (2003). The FlyBase database of the Drosophila genome projects and community literature Nucleic Acids Research, 31, 1, 172-175.

Foray, D. & Steinmueller, E. E. (2003). On the economics of R&D and technological collaborations: Insights and results from the project COLLINE Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 77-91.

Foster, I. (2005). Service-oriented science Science, 308(5723), 814-817.

Fox, E. A., & Marchionini, G. (2001). Digital libraries. Communications of the ACM, 44, 30-32.

Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: a critical review. Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-305.

Freeman, P. A., Crawford, D. L., Kim, S., & Munoz, J. L. (2005). Cyberinfrastructure for science and engineering: Promises and challenges Proceedings of the IEEE, 93(3), 682-691.

Fulker, D., Bates, S., & Jacobs, C. (1997). Unidata: A virtual community sharing resources via technological infrastructure Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78(3), 457-468.


Gaba, D. M., DeAnda, A. (1988). A comprehensive anesthesia simulation environment: recreating the operating room for research and training. Anesthesiology, 69, 387-94.

Galegher, J. R., & Kraut, R. E. (1994). Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: an experiment in group writing. Information Systems Research, 5, 110-138.

Galegher, J. R., Kraut, R. E., & Egido, C. (1990). Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, N.J: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

Galison, P. L., & Hevly, B. W. (1992). Big science: the growth of large-scale research. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.

Garskova, I. M. & Leonard, C. S. (2003). A virtual community in transition, a Russian social science and humanities network Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 61-76.

Genuth, J., Chompalov, I., & Shrum, W. (2000). How experiments begin: The formation of scientific collaborations Minerva, 38(3), 311-348.

Gibbs, W. W. (2002). Ripples in spacetime Scientific American, April, 62-71.

Ginsparg, P. (1994). First steps toward electronic research communication. Computers in Physics, 8(4), 390-396.

Glasner, P. (1996). From community to 'collaboratory'? The Human Genome Mapping Project and the changing culture of science Science and Public Policy, 23(2), 109-116.

Gomez, L., Fishman, B., & Pea, R. (1998). The CoVis project: Building a large-scale science education testbed. Interactive Learning Environments, 6(1-2), 59-92.

Goodnow, K. (2004). Sites for collaborative work: Cuba / Norway Journal of Digital Information Management, 2(1), 21-25.

Gray, P. M. D. & Kemp, G. J. L. (2000). Federated database technology for data integration: Lessons from bioinformatics. In S. H. Koslow & M. F. Huerta (Eds.). Electronic collaboration in science. (pp. 45-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Greif, Irene (1988). Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings. : Morgan Kaufman Press.

Grinter, R. E., Herbsleb, J. D., & Perry, D. W. (1999). The geography of coordination: Dealing with distance in R&D work. In Proceedings of SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. (pp. 306-315). New York: ACM Press.

Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 85-112.

Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (1999). The effects of workspace awareness support on the usability of real-time distributed groupware ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6, 243-281.


Hackett, E. J. (2005). Essential tensions: Identity, control, and risk in research Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 787-826.

Hadida-Hassan, M., Young, S. J., Peltier, S. T., Wong, M., Lamont, S., & Ellisman, M. H. (1999). Web-based telemicroscopy. Journal of Structural Biology, 125, 235-245.

Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.

Hall, R. W., Mathut, A., Jahanian, F., & Prakash, A. (1996). Corona: A communication service for scalable reliable group collaboration systems. In Ackerman, M. S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the ACM 1996 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. (pp. 140-149). New York: ACM.

Hansen, P., & J‰rvelin, K. (2004). Collaborative information searching in an information-intensive work domain: Preliminary results Journal of Digital Information Management, 2(1), 26-29.

Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S-L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 952-965.

Harasim, L. M. and Winkelmans, T. (1990). Computer-mediated scholarly collaboration Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 11, 382-409.

Herbsleb, J. D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T. A., & Grinter, R. E. (2000). Distance, dependencies and delay in a global collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM 2000 Conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW). (pp. 319-328). New York: ACM Press.

Herbsleb, J. D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T. A., & Grinter, R. E. (2001). An empirical study of global software development: distance and speed. In Proceedings of the ACM 23rd international conference on Software engineering. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. (pp. 81-90). New York: ACM Press.

Herbsleb, J. D., Klein, H., Olson, G. M., Brunner, H., Olson, J. S., & Harding, J. (1995). Object-oriented analysis and design in software project teams. Human-Computer Interaction, 10, 249-292.

Hesse, B. W., Sproull, L. S., Kiesler, S. B., & Walsh, J. P. (1993). Returns to science: Computer networks in oceanography. Communications of the ACM, 36(8), 90-101.

Hey, T. & Trefethen, A. (2003). e-Science and its implications Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A-Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361(1809), 1809-1825.

Hey, T. & Trefethen, A. (2005). Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science Science, 308(5723), 817-821.

Hiltz, S.R, & Turoff, M. (1993). The network nation: Human communication via computer (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Holohan, A., & Garg, A. (2005). Collaboration Online: The Example of Distributed Computing
. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), Article 16. Retrieved January 15, 2007, from

Horwitz, A. R., Watson, N. & Parsons, J. T. (2002). Breaking barriers through collaboration: the example of the Cell Migration Consortium Genome Biology, 3(11), comment2011.1-2011.4.

Hoyt, D. W., Burton, S. D., Peterson, M. R., Myers, J. D., & Chin, G. Jr. (2004). Expanding your laboratory by accessing collaboratory resources Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 378(6), 1408-1410.

Huang, C.C., Couch, G.S., Pettersen, E.F., and Ferrin, T.E. (1996). Chimera: An Extensible Molecular Modeling Application Constructed Using Standard Components. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 1. (pp. 724). : .

Hudson, T., Sonnenwald, D., Maglaughlin, K., Whitton, M., & Bergquist, R. (2000). Enabling distributed collaborative science. In Proceedings of the ACM 2000 Conference on Computer supported cooperative work. (pp. 353). : New York; ACM.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Huysman, Marleen, Charles Steinfield, Chyng-Yang Jang, Kenneth David, Mirjam Huis in ’t Veld,Janpoot & Ingrid Mulder (2003). Virtual Teams and the Appropriation of Communication Technology: Exploring the Concept of Media Stickiness Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) The Journal of Collaborative Computing
, 2003 1, 2, .


Iacono, S., & Weisband, S. (1997). Developing trust in virtual teams. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. (pp. 412-420). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.


Jang, C.-Y., Steinfield, C., and Pfaff, B. (2002). Virtual team awareness and groupware support: An evaluation of the TeamSCOPE system International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56, 109-126.

Jeffrey, P. (2003). Smoothing the waters: Observations on the process of cross-disciplinary research collaboration Social Studies of Science, 33(4), 539-562.

Jordan, Thomas H., Maechling, Philip J., and the SCEC/CME Collaboration (2003). The SCEC Community Modeling Environment--An information infrastructure for system-level earthquake science Seismological Research Letters: Electronic Supplement, 74(3), 44.


Kanefsky, B., Barlow, N. G. & Gulick, V. C. (). Can distribuited volunteers accomplish massive data analysis tasks?. Retrieved December 31, 1969, from NASA Ames, University of Central Florida, NASA Ames Web site:

Karen J. Lunsford & Bertram C. Bruce (2001). Collaboratories: Working together on the Web Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(1), .

Katz, J. S. & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.

Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31, 31-43.

Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40, 541-554.

Keller, G. Randy (2003). GEON (GEOScience Network)--A first step in creating cyberinfrastructure for the geosciences. Electronic Seismologist, July/August, n.p.. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from

Kibrick, R., Conrad A., & Perala A. (1998). Collaborative remote observing with the W.M. Keck Observatory. Interactions, May+June (3), .

Kiesler, S., & Cummings, J. (2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups?. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler Distributed Work. (pp. 57-80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kilman, D. G., & Forslund, D. W. (1997). An international collaboratory based on virtual patient records Communications of the ACM, 40(8), 110-117.

Kling, R., McKim, G., & King, A. (2002). A bit more to it: Scholarly Communication Forums as Socio-Technical Interaction Networks Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 47-67.

Knorr, K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.

Knorr-Cetina, K (1999). Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1995). How superorganisms change: Consensus formation and the social ontology of high-energy physics experiments. Social Studies of Science, 25, 119-147.

Kouzes, R. T. (2000). Electronic collaboration in environmental and physical sciences research. In S. H. Koslow & M. F. Huerta (editors). Electronic collaboration in science. (pp. 89-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kouzes, R. T., Meyers, J. D. & Wulf, W. A. (1996). Collaboratories: Doing science on the Internet Computer, v. 29, n.8, 40-46.

Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.

Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work.. In P. Hinds & S. B. Kiesler (Eds.). Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kraut, R. E., & Streeter, L. A. (1995). Coordination in software development. Communications of the Acm, 38, 69-81.

Kraut, R. E., Rice, R. E., Cool, C., & Fish, R. S. (1998). Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organization Science, 9, 437-453.

Kraut, R. E., Steinfield, C., Chan, A. P., Butler, B., & Hoag, A. (1999). Coordination and virtualization: The role of electronic networks and personal relationships. Organization Science, 10, 722-740.

Kraut, R.E., & Attewell, P. (1997). Media use in a global corporation: Electronic mail and organizational knowledge. In S. B. Kiesler (Ed.). Culture of the Internet. (pp. 323-342). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kraut, R.E., Egido, C., & Galegher, J. (1990). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration.. In R. Kraut, C. Egido, & J. Galegher (Eds.). Intellectual team work: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. (pp. 149-171). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kraut, R.E., Gallegher, J., & Egido, C. (1988). Relationships and tasks in scientific collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 31-58.


Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social contruction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lederberg, J., & Uncapher, K. (1989). Towards a national collaboratory: Report of an invitational workshop at the Rockefeller University, March 17-18. Rockefeller University Collaboratory Workshop. Washington, D.C: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Computer and Information Science Engineering.

Lee, J. H., Prakash, A., Jaeger, T., & Wu, G. (1996). Supporting multi-user, multi-applet workspaces in CBE. In Ackerman, M. S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the ACM 1996 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. (pp. 344-353). New York: ACM Press.

Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702.

Lewicki, G., Cohen, D., Losleben, P., & Trotter, D. (1984). MOSIS: Present and future. In P. Penfield (Ed,). Advanced research in VSLI. (pp. 124-128). Dedham, MA: Artech House, Inc..

Li, J., Ning, Y., Hedley, W., Saunders, B., Chen, Y., Tindill, N., Hannay, T. & Subramanian, S. (2002). The Molecule Pages database Nature, 420, 716-717.

Lipetz, B.A. (1999). Aspects of JASIS authorship through five decades. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(11), 994-1003.

Lynch, C., & Preston, C. (1990). Internet access to information resources. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 25, 263-312.

Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London, Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.


Maienschein, J. (1993). Why Collaborate? Journal of the History of Biology, 26, 167-183.

Mark, G., Grudin, J., & Poltrock, S. E. (1999). Meeting at the desktop: An empirical study of virtually collocated teams. In S. Bodker, M. Kyng, & K. Schmidt (Eds.). Proceedings of ECSCW'99, The 6th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12-16 September 1999, Copenhagen, Denmark. (pp. 159-178). Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.

Marx, V. (2002). Beautiful bioimages for the eyes of many beholders Science, 297, 39-40.

Mazur, A., & Boyko, E. (1981). Large-scale ocean research projects: What makes them succeed or fail? Social Studies of Science, 11, 425-449.

McDaniel, S. E., Olson, G. M., & Magee, J. C. (1996). Identifying and analyzing multiple threads in computer-mediated and face-to-face conversations. In Ackerman, M. S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the ACM 1996 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. (pp. 39-47). New York: ACM Press.

McHarg, B. B. (2000). The DIII-D computing environment: Characteristics and recent changes. Fusion Engineering and Design, 48, 77-82.

McHarg, B. B., Casper, T. A., Davis, S., & Greenwood, D. (1999). Tools for remote collaboration on the DIII-D National Fusion Facility. Fusion Engineering and Design, 43, 343-355.

Menzel, H. (1962). Planned and unplanned scientific communication. In B. Barber & W. Hirsch (Eds.). The sociology of science. (pp. 417-441). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Mercurio, P. J., Elvins, T. T., Young, S. J., Cohen, P. S., Fall, K. R., & Ellisman, M. H. (1992). The distributed laboratory: An interactive visualization environment for electron-microscopy and 3d imaging Communications of the ACM, 35(6), 54-63.

Miottia, L. & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? : An integrated framework of analysis
Research Policy, 32 (8), 1481-1499.

Monge, R.R., & Kirste, K.K. (1980). Measuring proximity in human organizations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 110-115.

Myers, J. D., Chappell, A. R., Elder, M. (2003). Re-integrating the research record Computing in Science & Engineering, May/June, 44-50.

Myers, J. D., Pancerella, C., Lansing, C., Schuchardt, K. L., & Didier, B. (2003). Multi-scale science: Supporting emerging practice with semantically derived provenance. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Web Technologies for Searching and Retrieving Scientific Data), 83, n.p.. Retrieved December 16, 2003, from

Myers, J.D., Chonacky, N., Dunning, T., & Leber, E. (1997). Collaboratories: Bringing national laboratories into the undergraduate classroom and laboratory. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 17(3), 116-120.


National Research Council (U.S.), Committee on a National Collaboratory : Establishing the User-Developer Partnership (1993). National collaboratories: applying information technology for scientific research. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.

National Research Council, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications (1999). Impact of Advances in Computing and Communications Technologies on Chemical Science and Technology: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Nentwich, Michael (2003). Cyberscience: research in the age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.

Newby, Gregory B. & Franks, Charles (2003). Distributed Proofreading. International Conference on Digital Libraries
Third ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries
. (pp. 3). Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Computer Society.

Newell, A., & Sproull, R. F. (1982). Computer networks: Prospects for scientists Science, 215, 843-852.

Newman, H. B., Ellisman, M. H., & Orcutt, J. A. (2003). Data-intensive e-science frontier research Communications of the ACM, 46(11), 68-77.

North Carolina Board of Science and Technology and National Research Council (1999). Collaboratories: Improving research capabilities in chemical and biomedical sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.


O'Hara-Devereaux, M., Johansen, R. (1994). Globalwork bridging distance, culture, and time. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Odlyzko, A. (1997). The Economics of Electronic Journals. First Monday, 2(8), . Retrieved November 23, 2002, from

Olson, G. M. & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139-179.

Olson, G. M. & Olson, J. S. (2003). Human-computer interaction: Psychological aspects of the human use of computing
Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 491-516.

Olson, G. M. & Olson, J. S. (2003). Mitigating the effects of distance on collaborative intellectual work Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 27-42.

Olson, G. M., Atkins, D, Clauer, R., Weymouth, T., Prakash, A., Finholt, T., Jahanian, F., & Rasmussen, C. (2001). Technology to support distributed team science: The first phase of the Upper Atmospheric Research Collaboratory (UARC). in G. M. Olson, T. Malone & J. Smith (Eds.). Coordination Theory and Collaboration Technology. (pp. 761-783). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Olson, G. M., Atkins, D. E., Clauer, R., Finholt, T.A., Jahanian, F., Killeen, T. I., Prakash, A., & Weymouth, T. (1998). The Upper Atmospheric Research Collaboratory (UARC) ACM Interactions, 5(4), 48-55.

Olson, G. M., Finholt, T. A., & Teasley, S. D. (2000). Behavioral aspects of collaboratories. In S. H. Koslow & M. F. Huerta (Eds.). Electronic collaboration in science. (pp. 1-14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Olson, G. M., Teasley, S. D., Bietz, M., & Cogburn, D. (2002). Collaboratories to support distributed science: the example of international HIV/AIDS research. Proceedings of the 2002 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on Enablement through technology. (pp. 44-51). Republic of South Africa: South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists.

Olson, G. M., Herbsleb, J. D., & Rueter, H. H. (1994). Characterizing the sequential structure of interactive behaviors through statistical and grammatical techniques Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 427-472.

Olson, J. S., & Teasley, S. (1996). Groupware in the wild: Lessons learned from a year of virtual collocation. In Ackerman, M. S. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. (pp. 419-427). Cambridge, MA: ACM Press.

Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., Storrosten, M., & Carter, M. (1993). Groupwork close-up: A comparison of the group design process with and without a simple-group editor ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11(4), 321-348.

Olson, J.S., Teasley, S., Covi, L., & Olson, G.M. (2002). The (currently) unique advantages of collocated work.. in S. Kiesler & P. Hinds (Eds.). Distributed Work. (pp. 113-135). : MIT Press.

Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire - the structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 541-574.


Pancerella, C.M., Rahn, L.A., & Yang, C.L. (1999). The Diesel Combustion Collaboratory: Combustion researchers collaborating over the Internet. In Proceedings of the 1999 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (CDROM). New York: ACM Press.

Patel, V.L., Kaufman, D.R., Allen, V.G., Shortliffe, E.H., Cimino, J.J., Greenes, R.A. (1999). Toward a framework for computer-mediated collaborative design in medical informatics Methods of Information in Medicine, 38, .

Pea, R. D. (1993). The Collaborative Visualization Project. Communications of the ACM, 36, 60-63.

Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pea, R.D., Tinker, R., Linn, M., Means, B., Bransford, J., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Brophy, S., & Songer, N. (1999). Toward a learning technologies knowledge network Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(2), 19-38.

Peleg M., et al. (2004). The InterMed approach to sharable computer-interpretable guidelines: A review Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11(1), 1-10.

Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1976). Scientists in organizations: productive climates for research and development (Rev. ed.). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

Potter, C. S., Carragher, B., Carroll, L., Conway,C., Grosser, B., Hanlon, J., et al. (2000). Bugscope: The second year of a sustainable remote microscope project for K-12 education outreach. In Bailey, G. W. (Ed.). Proceedings of Microscopy and Microanalysis 2000. (pp. 1160-1161). New York: Springer.

Potter, C. S., Carragher, B., Stone, D., Thakkar, U., Grosser, B., Hanlon, J., et al. (1999). Bugscope: A sustainable Web-based telemicroscopy project for K-12 classrooms. In Bailey, G. W. (Ed.). Proceedings of Microscopy and Microanalysis 1999. (pp. 514-515). New York: Springer.

Price, D. J. (1986). Little science, big science -- and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.

Price, D. J., & Beaver, D. D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21(11), 1011-1018.


R. Taussig, R. Ranganathan, E. M. Ross and A. G. Gilman (2002). Overview of the Alliance for Cellular Signaling Nature, 420, 703 - 706.

Raefaeli, M. S., Sudweeks, F., Konstan, J., & Mabry, E. (1998). ProjectH overview: A collaborative quantitative study of computer-mediated communication. In F. Sudweeks, M. McLaughlin, & M. S. Rafaeli (Eds.). Network and netplay: Virtual groups on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rhoten, D. (2003). Final report: A multi-method analysis of the social and technical conditions for interdisciplinary collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Hybrid Vigor Institute.

Ring, P. S., & Vandeven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19, 90-118.

Rogers, Everett M. (2002). The nature of technology transfer Science Communication, 23(3), 323-341.

Rogers, Everett M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. : Free Press; ; 5th edition.

Rogers, Juan D. (2000). Theoretical consideration of collaboration in scientific research. in Hauger, J. S., & McEnaney, C. (editors). Strategies for competitiveness in academic research. (pp. 151-178). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Ruhleder, K., & Jordan, B. (1999). Meaning-making across remote sites: How delays in transmission affect interaction. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on CSCW. (pp. 411-429). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Russell, J. M. (2001). Scientific communication at the beginning of the twenty-first century International Social Science Journal, 53(2), 271-282.


Sabelli, N., & Pea, R. (2004). Six years of knowledge networking in learning sciences and technologies. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

Schatz, B. (1991). Building an electronic community system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(3), 87-101.

Schatz, B. R., & Hardin, J. B. (1994). NCSA Mosaic and the World Wide Web: global hypermedia protocols for the Internet Science, 265, 895-901.

Schleyer, T. K. L. (2001). Collaboratories: Leveraging information technology for cooperative research
Journal of Dental Research, 80(6), 1508-1512.

Schunn, C., Crowley, K., & Okada, T. (2002). What makes collaborations across a distance succeed? The case of the cognitive science community. In P. Hinds & S. B. Kiesler (Eds.). Distributed work. (pp. 407-432). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Schur, A., Keating, K. A., Payne, D. A., Valdez, T., Yates, K. R., & Myers, J. D. (1998). Collaborative suites for experiment-oriented scientific research. ACM Interactions, 3(5), 40-47.

Shortliffe, E. H.; Patel, V. L., Cimino, J., Barnett, O.G., and Greenes, R. A. (1998). A study of collaboration among medical informatics research laboratories Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 12, 97-103.

Shrum, W. (2005). Reagency of the Internet, or, How I became a guest for science Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 723-754.

Shrum, W., Chompalov, I., & Genuth, J. (2001). Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations Social Studies of Science, 31(5), 681-730.

Sonnenwald, D. H. & Li, B.
(2003). Scientific collaboratories in higher education: Eploring learning style preferences and perceptions of technology British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 419-431.

Sonnenwald, D. H. (1995). Contested collaboration: A descriptive model of intergroup communication in information system design. Information Processing & Management, 31(6), 859-877.

Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). The conceptual organization: An emergent organizational form for collaborative R&D Science and Public Policy, 30(4), 261-272.

Sonnenwald, D. H., Bergquist, R. E., Maglaughlin, K. L., Kupstas-Soo, E., & Whitton, M. C. (2001). Designing to support collaborative scientific research across distances: The nanoManipulator environment. in Churchill, E. F., Snowdon, D. N., & Munro, A. J. (editors). Collaborative virtual environments: Digital places and spaces for interaction. (pp. 202-224). London: Springer-Verlag.

Sonnenwald, D. H., Maglaughlin K. L., and Whitton, M. C. (2004). Designing to support situation awareness across distances: An example from a scientific collaboratory Information Processing & Management, 40(6), 989-1011.

Sonnenwald, D. H., & Pierce, L. G. (2000). Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: Interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control. Information Processing & Management, 36, 461-479.

Sonnenwald, D. H., Livonen, M., Alpi, J., & Kokkinen, H. (1998). Collaborative learning using collaboration technology: Report from the field. In Eurelings, A. (Ed.). Proceedings of BITE: Bringing Information and Communications Technology to Higher Education International Conference. Maastricht, the Netherlands.. (pp. 241-246). Dordrecht, The Netherlands.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Sonnenwald, D. H.; Whitton, M. C.; Maglaughlin K. L. (2003). Evaluating a scientific collaboratory: Results of a controlled experiment ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Volume 10 , Issue 2, 150 - 176.

Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. B. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Star, S. L. and Ruhleder, K. (1994). Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. In Furuta, R. and Neuwirth, C. (Eds.). Proceedings of the ACM 1994 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. (pp. 253-264). New York: ACM Press.

Star, S.L. and Ruhleder, K. (1996). The ecology of infrastructure: Problems in the implementation of large-scale information systems Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111-134.

Stein, A., Keiper, J., Bezerra, L., Brocks, H., & Thiel, U. (2004). Collaborative research and documentation of European film history: The COLLATE Collaboratory Journal of Digital Information Management, 2(1), 30-39.

Steinfield (). , , .

Stokols, D., Fuqua, J., Gress, J., Harvey, R., Phillips, K., Baezconde-Garbanati, L., Unger, J., Palmer, P., Clark, M., Colby, S., Morgan, G., and Trochim, W. (2003). Evaluating transdisciplinary science Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5 (Supplement 1), 21-39.

Stokols, D., Harvey, R., Gress, J., Fuqua, J., and Phillips, K. (2005). In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration: Lessons learned and implications for active living research American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29 (Supplement 2), 202-213.

Stork, David G. (1999). Character and Document Research in the Open Mind Initiative. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. (pp. 1-12). : IEEE Computer Press.

Sunderam, V., Cheung, S. Y., Hirsch, M., Chodrow, S., Grigni, M., Krantz, A., Rhee, I., Gray, P., Olesen, S., Hutto, P., Sult, J. (1998). CCF: Collaborative Computing Frameworks. in Proceedings of the 1998 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing. (pp. 1-6). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.


Tang, J. C., Isaacs, E. A., & Rua, M. (1994). Supporting distributed groups with a montage of lightweight interactions. In R. Furuta, & C. Neuwirth (Eds.). Proceedings of the ACM 1994 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. (pp. 23-34). New York: ACM Press.

Taubes, G. (1993). Networks: Publication by electronic mail takes physics by storm. Science, 259, 1246-1248.

Taubes, G. (1996). Electronic journals: Electronic preprints point the way to 'author empowerment'. Science, 271, 767-768.

Teasley, S. & Wolinsky, S. (2001). Scientific collaboration at a distance Science, 292(5525), 2254-2255.

Thakkar, U., Bruce, B. C., Hogan, M. C., & Williamson, J. (2001). Extending literacy through participation in new technologies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45(3), 212-219.

Thomas, S. M. (2003). European collaboration in biotechnology: The molecular analysis of genomes International Journal of Technology Management, 25(1-2), 81-95.

Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Treloar D, Hawayek J, Montgomery JR, Russell W; Medical Readiness Trainer Team (2001). Onsite and distance education of emergency medicine personnel with a human patient simulator Military Medicine, 166(11), 1003-6.

Trickett, S. B., Fu, W., Schunn, C. D., & Trafton, J. G. (2000). From dipsy-doodles to streaming motions: Changes in representation in the analysis of visual scientific data. In L. R. Gleitman & K. J. Aravind (Eds.). Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.. (pp. xx-xxx). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.


Van Alstyne, M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Could the Internet balkanize science? Science, 274, 1479-1480.

Van Buren, D., Curtis, P., Nichols, D. A., & Brundage, M. (1995). The AstroVR Collaboratory: An on-line multi-user environment for research in astrophysics. In R. A. Shaw, H. E. Payne, and J. J. E. Hayes (Eds.). Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 77, 1995. (pp. 99). San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific (APS).

Vaughan, Diane (1999). The Role of the Organization in the Production of Techno-Scientific Knowledge Social Studies of Science, 29, 913-943..

Veigel, J. M. (2000). Collaborative strategies: Good science plus bad management equals bad science. in Hauger, J. S., & McEnaney, C (editors). Strategies for competitiveness in academic research. (pp. 115-149). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.


Waldby, C (2000). The Visible Human Project: Informatic bodies and posthuman medicine.. New York: Routledge.

Walsh, J. P., & Maloney, N. (2001). Scientific productivity, new communication technology and inequality: Does CMC narrow the gap?. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.). Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Walsh, J. P., & Roselle, A. (1999). Computer networks and the virtual college.. A. Kent & H. Lancour (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science Vol 65.. (pp. 22-42). New York: M. Dekker.

Walsh, J. P., & Bayma, T. (1996). Computer networks and scientific work. Social Studies of Science, 26, 661-703.

Weedman, J. (1998). The structure of incentive: Design and client roles in application-oriented research Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23(3), 315-345.

Weinberg, A. (1961). Impact of large-scale science on the United States. Science, 134, 161-164.

Weisband, S. (2002). Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance. In P. Hinds & S. B. Kiesler (Eds.). Distributed work. (pp. 311-333). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Westfall, C. (2001). Collaborating together: The stories of TPC, UA1, CDF, and CLAS Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 32(1), 163-178.

Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences (Rev. Ed). New York: Oxford University Press.

Wouters, P. and Schroder, P. (editors (Book series :The Public Domain of Digital Research Data)). (2003). Promise and practice in data sharing. Amsterdam, NL: NIWI-KNAW (ISBN 90 6472 184 x).

Wray, K. B. (2002). The epistemic significance of collaborative research Philosophy of Science, 69, 150-168.

Wulf, W.A. (1989). The national collaboratory - a white paper. In J. Lederberg & K. Uncaphar (Eds.). Towards a National Collaboratory: Report of an invitational workshop at the Rockefeller University, March 17-18, 1989. (pp. Appendix A). Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Computer and Information Science Engineering.

Wulf, W.A. (1993). The collaboratory opportunity. Science, 261 (5123), 854-855.


Young, S. J., Fan, G. Y., Hessler, D., Lamont, S., Elvins, T. T., Hadida-Hassan, M., Hanyzewski, G. A., Durking, J. W., Hubbard, P., Kindlmann, G., Wong, E., Greenberg, D., Karin, S., & Ellisman, M. H. (1996). Implementing a collaboratory for microscopic digital anatomy. International Journal of Supercomputing Applications and High Performance Computing, 10(2/3), 170-181.


Zabusky, S. E. (1995). Launching Europe: an ethnography of European cooperation in space science. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

Zaluzec, N. (1997). Interactive collaboratories for microscopy and microanalysis. In Proceedings of the 3rd Multinational Congress on Electron Microscopy, (MCEM 97). Portoroz, Slovenia. Portoroz, Slovenia: .

Zaluzec, N. (1998). The telepresence microscopy collaboratory Teleconference, 17(9), 17-20.

Zare, R.N. (1997). Knowledge and distributed intelligence Science, 275, 1047.

  Home | About SOC | Workshops | Resources | News & Events  

University of California, Irvine Logo

University of California, Irvine

School of Information Logo

School of Information University of Michigan